Skip to main content

Santa is Canadian if you want him to be

Today, Kory's Kapers, formally know as the Toronto Sun newspaper, has a picture of a jet and a headline, Ruskies Sent Packing and then an article asking Are we prepared to defend the north? This piece of political propaganda is nothing more than an imaginary argument to justify the $9 billion, F-35 purchase and ramp up the so called Tim Hortons crowd who believe the crap that governments and in particular this government puts out.

Regardless of whether Russia plants a flag at the bottom of the arctic ocean or DenMark opens a weather station in the arctic or Harper moves the elite forces of the Van Doos north to surround Santa's village, the decision on which country owns which part of the arctic and more importantly the possibly resource rich Lomonosov ridge will be decided by the proposals put forth to the UN by each country making a claim.

Of course none of that is explained in Kory's Kapers. 

The good thing about blogging is that you end up reading a lot of articles and sometimes actually discover facts. The bad thing about blogging is the frustration you feel when you realize that the so called real journalists ignore or conveniently leave those facts out for either their own biasses or more likely in this case to keep kindred with Kory's kabuki.



Brian said…
You can also read McKay quoted in the Toronto Sun saying

" NORAD fighter jets have intercepted between 12 and 18 Russian bombers per year since 2007."
So in other words for the past three years it hasn’t been newsworthy until the announcement of F-35. These bombers have been intercepted over the Arctic Ocean which is no place for a single engine fighter. The Liberals have also stated that we need more than the 65 aircraft of whatever type that the Cons are planning on ordering. How could this possibly be embarrassing for Ignatieff?.

I’m waiting with baited breath for the cause of the F-18 crash in Lethbridge. As a pilot and former CC-130 Flight Engineer it does sound like the cause could be engine failure. Of course according to McKay engines on F-35s will never fail, even over the Arctic Ocean.
WILLY said…
Hi Brian

I am trying to cut back on both double doubles and reading that rag and pretty near all press releases coming indirectly from the PMO in whatever format or medium they are delivered to me.

You may be correct about the ability of fighters to handle the arctic and the politicians may be right about our need for an air force.

Although it seems somewhat redundant when you consider the size of the military and fleets of aircraft (if military planes are called fleets) of the countries that surround us. If it came to repelling an aggressor we would certainly be out gunned by the sheer volume alone, unless of course our planes are only going to be bought and used to create an international incident.

To me it is more like the military wanting the latest iPod when the old ones can still play the tunes or in this case, eventually get shot down.

As for Iggy, sadly he and/or his handlers seem to be grasping for that old LPC centrist position. Foolishly in my humble opinion.

Harper on the other hand is out to ruin my country.
Anonymous said…

Single engine jets have no place over the Atlantic? Oh really?

You should let the Brits and the Americans know. They should probably ditch the Harrier. You should also tell the yanks, the Norwegians and the Danes to stop operating F-16s in and around the Arctic Circle. And pass the memo to the Swedes who operate hundreds of single engine Gripens as well.

As for the crash, doesn't that kinda prove the point that two engines might not necessarily get you home any safer than one? Aside from the Lethbridge crash, read up on the Hornet that slammed into suburban San Diego. He didn't make it home on his second engine either.

Cost wise the JSF is the second cheapest of all the contenders we would look at (Gripen NG, JSF, Super Hornet, Rafale, Typhoon).

Just look at the Aussie purchase of Super Hornets. US$ 2.2 billion for 24 jets and US$ 2.4 billion for 10 years of support. Extrapolate that to 20 years and 65 jets and we'd pay $6 billion to buy those planes and $13 billion for 20 years of support. That's $3 billion more than we are paying for our $9 billion purchase and $7 billion for 20 years of support.

There's only one plane that's cheaper: the Gripen NG. And that plane had its first flight 8 years after our Hornets came into service. Lipstick on a pig.
WILLY said…
Well, thank you Anonymous from the Defense Research Establishment at, Your commercial googlebot went thru at about 10:30 from Mountainview and assume that you didn't get around to placing a comment here until after lunch.

Just a sugestion here, this is what you would call a very obscure, low traffic blog, and really not worth the effort to refute the foolishness that is usually being posted or as in this case, the more informed comment by Brian.

Besides you are getting paid on my dime, so get back to work doing something else, like I don't know, defending the country..

Popular posts from this blog

PizzaGate explained

Never heard Bernie speak until after the US election, saw the debates and thought Hillary cleaned Trump's clock. Knew Trump was a prick and couldn't understand how any sane person would vote for him, yet for some reason, I called myself a Bernie guy, didn't trust Hillary and had no idea why.

But, at least I didn't take my gun to a pizza joint to break up a pedophilia ring in the basement and end up getting four years in prison, like Ed Welch from North Carolina.

RollingStone in partnership with the Investigative Fund and the Centre for Investigative Reporting along with five other journalists tracked down the origins and methodologies used to propagate the most successful fake news story of the past election,

A good twenty minute read here.

Perils of shopping online

Thought I'd try that new millennial thing this year. You know that online shopping thing using your computer, that the kids are all into today.  Saved a ton of time, however there were a few drawbacks.  On boxing Day I had to spend a half an hour with my eleven year old granddaughter explaining how Trump called Clinton nasty in the second debate and this girl in Kentucky wrote a slam poem about it and then Ashley Judd an old actress heard it and performed it at the women's march following Trump's inauguration and that the word Nasty on the black tank top I bought her from the Young Turks web store was actually a positive thing, in fact a shield for women to protect themselves from the assholes of the world.  Next year I'll try not to do my online shopping at three in the morning after a joint and couple single malts. Other than that it's been a pretty good Christmas season. Hope you are having a good time too.

The Great Wall of China, the Tar Sands and now, My Bald Head

Damn you Google Earth and your Deep State technology!