Skip to main content

Ed Broadbents warning

As a follow up to his television interview where he outright accused Harper of lying to the Canadians, Ed Broadbent has written a scathing article on Harper’s reckless power grab.
Excerpts from the Globe and Mail

Since first being elected to the House of Commons in 1968, at a time of great national unity, I have never witnessed a Canadian prime minister consciously decide to disunite the nation. Until now

Now, for the first time in our history, we have a prime minister prepared to set a fire that we may not be able to put out, for the paltry purpose of saving himself from a confidence vote on Monday.

In almost every sentence, paragraph and page coming from Mr. Harper, his ministers and Conservative MPs, we're getting distortions intended to delegitimize a democratically formed coalition, proposed in accordance with normal parliamentary practices, between the Liberals and the NDP.

Instead of focusing on accommodation, on the need for early action on the economy, Mr. Harper is launching hypocritical attacks that can lead to a national disaster, and, with the time prorogation has granted him, he will no doubt continue to promote disunity.

Instead of following constitutional precedent and allowing a democratic confidence vote to take place when it should, we have a power-hungry man who will be recorded as the first prime minister in Canada's history to deliberately create a political crisis and set the fire of national disunity.
Although there is much consternation among progressives, myself included, about yesterday’s proroguing of the legislature, rightly or wrongly granted by the governor general, it is also part of our parliamentary process and presumably an opportunity to refocus.

Our country needs leadership in preparation for the oncoming economic meltdown and personally I don’t care if it comes from the minority government working with the opposition or the majority coalition working despite the minority.

However all Canadians should take heed of Mr. Broadbent’s warning.

We now have a power hungry ideologue as prime minister who has been rebuked and similar to a wounded animal he will continue to attack regardless of the consequences.

Mr. Harper wants to turn this rebuke of his ill conceived, partisan, ideological, economic update into a referendum of parliamentary procedure, national unity and another untimely, wasteful election.

It is with little wonder at times like this that I have more in common with the sovereignists in Quebec than I do with the conservatives in Canada.


janfromthebruce said…
Another thing. So Harper now decides STRATEGICALLY to work with the other parties. Remember, it is a minority. But in the "right amount of time, he triggers another election (cause he is in majority territory), and having shown to the public that he can in fact work with other parties, and looks are conciliatory, and gets a majority. Make no mistake, the face and actions we just saw is exactly what he will do futuristically. He is an ideologically driven neoconservative of the Rove type, and his henchmen are too.

The only way to subvert this, is for the coalition to succeed and show Canadians that yes, we Can...ada. He has a trap and it is the sweater guy coming again - don't be fooled - the beast is wounded but is the same beast.
Beijing York said…
I would add jan that a wounded beast is even more dangerous. Harper was willing to transform Canada incrementally but this week he demonstrated that he is more than willing to change things dramatically when he is desperate.

Popular posts from this blog

Election close call, Omar, Bob and move over Warren

Wow that was a close one:
With the NDP leading in the polls at the beginning of September, I started to prepare myself, for the very first time in my life, to vote for the NDP. Mulcair looked good enough for me, with some of the best lines about Harper's Government during most of his interviews, except that he would always add the phrase, "just like the liberals" to the end of it and I thought, if I'm one of those Harper hating, Liberal voters that you probably need to vote for you, why the hell are you insulting me with this partisan bullshit.


That is the number of Syrian refuges that the Harper government has brought into Canada.

From the Globe and Mail:
However, the government is facing criticism because 2,374 Syrian refugees have so far been settled. Of that number, only 622 - or 26 percent - were assisted by the government. The others were privately sponsored by individuals or non-government. The others were privately sponsored by individuals or non-government organizations. The NDP argues that in addition to private sponsors, the government should immediately accept 10,000 Syrian refugees. Liberal leader Justin Trudeau said the target should be 25,000 government-sponsored refugees, which he estimates would cost Ottawa $100-million.In other words the Harper government that banters around the 10,000 plus refugee number has brought in 622 refugees or about 170 families.

The other 2,352 so called refugees that Harper has allowed to emigrate to Canada consist of wealthy Syrian Christians who paid their own way in, hightailing …

Surprising how some tunes are just timeless