Skip to main content

Apparently the only plan Baird, can come up with to meet Kyoto is a tax grab at the pumps

What is it with these Tories. Tax grab, tax grab, tax grab and always at the gas pumps! That's all I ever hear coming out their mouths lately. I even think I heard them talking it up on the radio the other day.

Well excuse me John, if that's the best you've got, I think I like the sound of Stephane's plan better.

In an interview with the CBC, following the first day of the Federal Court case against the government for failing to comply with the Kyoto Protocol Implementation Act (KPIA) passed in Parliament last year, Baird said:
"We'll follow the letter of the law, and we'll make our case in court. But simply put … this bill, if taken to its logical conclusion, would require us to put a 50-cent-a-litre tax on gasoline at the pumps," "And that's just not something I'm prepared to do."
Well which is it John, are you not prepared to follow the letter of law and meet the Kyoto commitments of reducing carbon dioxide by 6% below the 1990 levels and submit timely, scheduled reports as enacted by KPIA. 

Or are you not willing to place an additional tax.

I would assume that you would not want to defy the will of Parliament and break the laws of Canada by not putting forth a plan to meet the Kyoto commitment.  

I know it is confusing, so let me help you out here John.
I would suggest that you pay close attention to Stephane Dion on Thursday, as he starts to present the Liberals green plan. It supposedly contains a "carbon tax" that actually won't apply additional taxes to fuel used for transportation.
All I can add is THINK GREEN John, THINK GREEN!

CORRECTION: In a previous post explaining the Friends of the Earth, KPIA case here, I gave credit to Paul Martin for the Liberal Private Members Bill that became law last year. (probably part of my new found appreciation for him). Well in reality the Kyoto Protocol Implementation Act was sponsored by Liberal Pablo Rodriguez. That is his picture on the left, being congratulated at the passing of the bill into law.


Popular posts from this blog

Election close call, Omar, Bob and move over Warren

Wow that was a close one:
With the NDP leading in the polls at the beginning of September, I started to prepare myself, for the very first time in my life, to vote for the NDP. Mulcair looked good enough for me, with some of the best lines about Harper's Government during most of his interviews, except that he would always add the phrase, "just like the liberals" to the end of it and I thought, if I'm one of those Harper hating, Liberal voters that you probably need to vote for you, why the hell are you insulting me with this partisan bullshit.


That is the number of Syrian refuges that the Harper government has brought into Canada.

From the Globe and Mail:
However, the government is facing criticism because 2,374 Syrian refugees have so far been settled. Of that number, only 622 - or 26 percent - were assisted by the government. The others were privately sponsored by individuals or non-government. The others were privately sponsored by individuals or non-government organizations. The NDP argues that in addition to private sponsors, the government should immediately accept 10,000 Syrian refugees. Liberal leader Justin Trudeau said the target should be 25,000 government-sponsored refugees, which he estimates would cost Ottawa $100-million.In other words the Harper government that banters around the 10,000 plus refugee number has brought in 622 refugees or about 170 families.

The other 2,352 so called refugees that Harper has allowed to emigrate to Canada consist of wealthy Syrian Christians who paid their own way in, hightailing …

Surprising how some tunes are just timeless