Skip to main content

Banning phrases for 2009

Lake Superior State University has issued their 34th annual List of Words to Be Banished from the Queen's English for misuse, over-use and general uselessness.

Here is their list for 2009 .
  1. GREEN
  2. CARBON FOOTPRINT or CARBON OFFSETTING
  3. MAVERICK
  4. FIRST DUDE
  5. BAILOUT
  6. WALL STREET/MAIN STREET
  7. MONKEY (apparently a chat thing where you add a Monkey to proper nouns?
  8. <3 (another chat thing meaning heart something. I really try not to chat a lot)
  9. ICON or ICONIC
  10. GAME CHANGER
  11. STAYCATION
  12. DESPERATE SEARCH
  13. NOT SO MUCH
  14. WINNER OF FIVE NOMINATIONS
  15. IT'S THAT TIME OF YEAR AGAIN
Which got me to thinking that we should ban some over used, abused, misleading, out right deceptive, phrases that our politicians have plagued us with this year.

Here are the one’s that irk me the most.

  • our Government is addressing the needs of
    • as in the conservatives have used more public funds to either buy votes from ethic associations or do some seeding in conservative regions
  • steady hand upon the
    • as in Harper has leadership
  • permanent deficit
    • as in federal government will run a deficit -- but not a permanent one
  • streamlining
    • as in strengthening regulatory cooperation, streamlining regulations and processes, which means turning the regulation of standards, safeguards and processes over to the private sector.

Bought any cold meat lately.


Feel free to add your own.

Comments

Troy Thomas said…
Technical deficit: as in it's a decifit, but not a real one because the government is highly optimistic.

Popular posts from this blog

662

That is the number of Syrian refuges that the Harper government has brought into Canada.

From the Globe and Mail:
However, the government is facing criticism because 2,374 Syrian refugees have so far been settled. Of that number, only 622 - or 26 percent - were assisted by the government. The others were privately sponsored by individuals or non-government. The others were privately sponsored by individuals or non-government organizations. The NDP argues that in addition to private sponsors, the government should immediately accept 10,000 Syrian refugees. Liberal leader Justin Trudeau said the target should be 25,000 government-sponsored refugees, which he estimates would cost Ottawa $100-million.In other words the Harper government that banters around the 10,000 plus refugee number has brought in 622 refugees or about 170 families.

The other 2,352 so called refugees that Harper has allowed to emigrate to Canada consist of wealthy Syrian Christians who paid their own way in, hightailing …

Election close call, Omar, Bob and move over Warren

Wow that was a close one:
With the NDP leading in the polls at the beginning of September, I started to prepare myself, for the very first time in my life, to vote for the NDP. Mulcair looked good enough for me, with some of the best lines about Harper's Government during most of his interviews, except that he would always add the phrase, "just like the liberals" to the end of it and I thought, if I'm one of those Harper hating, Liberal voters that you probably need to vote for you, why the hell are you insulting me with this partisan bullshit.