Skip to main content

Graphic Tobacco Labels, failing to quell smokers subconcious death wish

I knew this was bad idea from the start.
According to the latest Health Canada poll, the much heralded placement of cancerous deathlike graphics across the top of cigarette packages is ineffective at persuading smokers to try to kick the habit. 
Unfortunately I am both a smoker and a believer of Wilson Bryan Keyes theories of subliminal advertising. I made my tin foil hat from the foil in cigarette packages.
Anyway, according to Keyes, cigarette advertisers inserted hellish cancerous deathlike imagery into their cigarette advertising to target the “subconscious death wish” inherent in the majority of smokers.

Simply stated his theory was that smokers were well aware of the risks of smoking and were in fact rebelling against the perceived norms of society at a semi-conscious level.

To target the rebelliousness of the act of smoking, advertisers implanted hidden and obscure, imagery, graphics, effects and phrases into their ads to increase the subconscious risk taking of the smoker.
Based on Keyes theories, I'm really surprised that more people didn't start smoking.

The Health Canada campaign would of been more successful if they had forced the manufacturers to place puppies, flowers, rainbows and teddy bears on the packages.

My suggestion to the anti-smoking lobby at Health Canada is to just write "Your Choice" on the pack and leave it at that.

In case they are going to become a collectible in the future, I have placed my two favorites cigarette graphics at the top. These are the two that I always ask for.

Strangely Health Canada decided to release the flaccid cigarette graphic, a month before the erect cigarette graphic. Personally I thought this was totally backwards and in fact ended up giving a completely opposite message to the what was intended.

Reference: The Gazette here.


Beijing York said…
My favourite is the statistic/graph one. It states that the second highest cause of death among Canadians is suicide. It's the only place I have ever seen that stat.

Popular posts from this blog

Election close call, Omar, Bob and move over Warren

Wow that was a close one:
With the NDP leading in the polls at the beginning of September, I started to prepare myself, for the very first time in my life, to vote for the NDP. Mulcair looked good enough for me, with some of the best lines about Harper's Government during most of his interviews, except that he would always add the phrase, "just like the liberals" to the end of it and I thought, if I'm one of those Harper hating, Liberal voters that you probably need to vote for you, why the hell are you insulting me with this partisan bullshit.


That is the number of Syrian refuges that the Harper government has brought into Canada.

From the Globe and Mail:
However, the government is facing criticism because 2,374 Syrian refugees have so far been settled. Of that number, only 622 - or 26 percent - were assisted by the government. The others were privately sponsored by individuals or non-government. The others were privately sponsored by individuals or non-government organizations. The NDP argues that in addition to private sponsors, the government should immediately accept 10,000 Syrian refugees. Liberal leader Justin Trudeau said the target should be 25,000 government-sponsored refugees, which he estimates would cost Ottawa $100-million.In other words the Harper government that banters around the 10,000 plus refugee number has brought in 622 refugees or about 170 families.

The other 2,352 so called refugees that Harper has allowed to emigrate to Canada consist of wealthy Syrian Christians who paid their own way in, hightailing …

Surprising how some tunes are just timeless