Skip to main content

One step at a time, Stephane

Stephan, your excuse, for going AWOL on the second reading of this abortion of a bill, was that Liberal leaders traditionally do not vote on private member bills, at least according to my MP.

So your vow yesterday, to defeat bill C-484 in third reading is a good sign, that you are finally realizing that Harper is not playing by the same rules as the rest of you are.

You will most likely need to whip your caucus to get the votes, which if successful would be a step in the right direction to reclaiming your leadership and in focussing your members.

But my guess is that Harper won’t let the bill go for a third reading. He doesn’t like to loose and the only positive in the bill being defeated would be to blame the Liberals.

His evangelical base that want this bill are not going to desert Harper either way. So instead of giving you the opportunity to take credit in the bills defeat and possibly increase solidarity within your own party, the bill will die on the vine.

Hey, you did the right thing anyway.

You are running 4th in Quebec, Stephane and continuing to do the right thing, is about the only chance you have in stopping Harper from getting his majority in the next election. So continue taking the high road, act with principle and start becoming the official opposition, it might even get you some additional votes.

And by the way it would of been nice to hear you apologize for doing the wrong think last time, but hey, one step at a time.


Popular posts from this blog

Election close call, Omar, Bob and move over Warren

Wow that was a close one:
With the NDP leading in the polls at the beginning of September, I started to prepare myself, for the very first time in my life, to vote for the NDP. Mulcair looked good enough for me, with some of the best lines about Harper's Government during most of his interviews, except that he would always add the phrase, "just like the liberals" to the end of it and I thought, if I'm one of those Harper hating, Liberal voters that you probably need to vote for you, why the hell are you insulting me with this partisan bullshit.


That is the number of Syrian refuges that the Harper government has brought into Canada.

From the Globe and Mail:
However, the government is facing criticism because 2,374 Syrian refugees have so far been settled. Of that number, only 622 - or 26 percent - were assisted by the government. The others were privately sponsored by individuals or non-government. The others were privately sponsored by individuals or non-government organizations. The NDP argues that in addition to private sponsors, the government should immediately accept 10,000 Syrian refugees. Liberal leader Justin Trudeau said the target should be 25,000 government-sponsored refugees, which he estimates would cost Ottawa $100-million.In other words the Harper government that banters around the 10,000 plus refugee number has brought in 622 refugees or about 170 families.

The other 2,352 so called refugees that Harper has allowed to emigrate to Canada consist of wealthy Syrian Christians who paid their own way in, hightailing …

Surprising how some tunes are just timeless