Skip to main content

Harper to teach Europeans about climate change

This can't be good.

From the Globe article here:
Harper plans to lay out the Canadian position on climate change when he meets with the leaders of four key members of the Group of Eight industrial nations before the annual G8 summit in July. Harper wants to have some frank discussions of what Canada's doing, because I think there's a feeling that people don't understand the depth and the range of Canada's national programs of action.
Guess what Steve the Europeans already understand your position.
“They're frankly getting very, very upset,” he said. “If Canada's not going to be serious about respecting the penalty for non-compliance, then frankly their view is ‘listen, get out then.' Because what you're doing is completely compromising the regime.”
Great, either Canada becomes the first country thrown out of Kyoto or Canada becomes known as the country that destroyed it.



PS: On a slightly positive note George Bush will have someone to sit next to this time.


You can just hear Harper turning to Bush now "Don't worry George, the oil is still going flow. No one in Canada even reads the reports. Thank God for the cold spring and the high price of gas. Oh and let Larry know I got a chuckle out of his Senate appearance, last week."

Comments

Anonymous said…
Nice myth, complete with a misleading graphic. In fact, Canada's position has a lot more in common with Europe, and Harper has sided with other nations to oppose the US more than once.

For example, Canada sided against the US Feb 07 in order to get them to agree to an international cap and trade system. The US was finally pressured into signing.

At the G8 in June 07 Canada agreed with other countries to cut GHG emissions by 50-60% by 2050, but the US refused unless China and India took on targets. Canada held out in an attempt to get the US to sign, but we finally signed the agreement when it was clear there would be no movement from the US.

In December '07 Canada signed the Bali Communiqué which lays the groundwork for post-Kyoto binding targets. The US insisted these be 'aspirational' but at least they signed it. Canada was, and is, advocating binding international targets.

Popular posts from this blog

662

That is the number of Syrian refuges that the Harper government has brought into Canada.

From the Globe and Mail:
However, the government is facing criticism because 2,374 Syrian refugees have so far been settled. Of that number, only 622 - or 26 percent - were assisted by the government. The others were privately sponsored by individuals or non-government. The others were privately sponsored by individuals or non-government organizations. The NDP argues that in addition to private sponsors, the government should immediately accept 10,000 Syrian refugees. Liberal leader Justin Trudeau said the target should be 25,000 government-sponsored refugees, which he estimates would cost Ottawa $100-million.In other words the Harper government that banters around the 10,000 plus refugee number has brought in 622 refugees or about 170 families.

The other 2,352 so called refugees that Harper has allowed to emigrate to Canada consist of wealthy Syrian Christians who paid their own way in, hightailing …

Election close call, Omar, Bob and move over Warren

Wow that was a close one:
With the NDP leading in the polls at the beginning of September, I started to prepare myself, for the very first time in my life, to vote for the NDP. Mulcair looked good enough for me, with some of the best lines about Harper's Government during most of his interviews, except that he would always add the phrase, "just like the liberals" to the end of it and I thought, if I'm one of those Harper hating, Liberal voters that you probably need to vote for you, why the hell are you insulting me with this partisan bullshit.